This site uses cookies. Browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies. If you need more information, please visit the Cookies Policy page

Русский

English

Enter / Registration

Cryptocurrencies: 8205 / Markets: 112841

Market Cap: $ 2 115 884 317 716 / 24h Vol: $ 92 931 100 230 / BTC Dominance: 58.009579498077%

Н News

Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle dead or are market makers in denial?

Bitcoin’s four-year cycle used to offer a simple script: halving rewards meant scarcity, and scarcity meant higher prices.

This pattern held for over a decade. Every four years, the network’s reward to miners was halved, thereby tightening the supply, followed by a speculative frenzy that resulted in a new all-time high.

However, as Bitcoin hovers just above $100,000 this week, down about 20% from its October peak of over $126,000, that old narrative is wearing thin.

Wintermute, one of the largest market makers in digital assets, has now said the quiet part aloud. “The halving-driven four-year cycle is no longer relevant,” it argued in a recent note. “What drives performance now is liquidity.” The statement may sound heretical to long-time Bitcoin believers, but the data leaves little room for debate.

The market is now dominated by ETFs, stablecoins, and institutional liquidity flows, with miner issuance appearing to be a rounding error.

Liquidity rewrites the four-year cycle rules

Bitcoin’s latest rally and retreat map neatly onto one metric: ETF inflows. In the week ending October 4, global crypto ETFs raised a record $5.95 billion, with U.S. funds accounting for the majority of the funds. Just two days later, daily net inflows hit $1.2 billion, the highest on record.

That flood of capital coincided almost perfectly with Bitcoin’s climb to its new all-time high near $126,000. When the inflows slowed later in the month, so did the market. By early November, with mixed ETF prints and light outflows, Bitcoin had slipped back toward the $100,000 line.

The parallel is striking but not coincidental. For years, the halving was the cleanest model investors had for Bitcoin’s supply and demand mechanics: every 210,000 blocks, the number of new coins awarded to miners halves.

Since April’s event, that figure sits at 3.125 BTC per block, or roughly 450 new coins per day, equivalent to around $45 million at current prices. That may sound like a large daily injection of supply, but it’s dwarfed by the sheer scale of institutional capital now coursing through ETFs and other financial products.

When just a handful of ETFs can absorb $1.2 billion of Bitcoin in one day, that inflow is twenty-five times the amount of new supply entering the market each day. Even routine weekly net flows often match or exceed the entire week’s worth of newly minted coins.

The halving didn’t stop mattering entirely, as it still wields an outsized influence on miner economics. But, in terms of market pricing, the math has changed significantly. The limiting factor isn’t how many new coins are produced, but how much capital is flowing through regulated channels.

Stablecoins add another layer to this new liquidity economy. The total supply of dollar-pegged tokens now hovers between $280 billion and $308 billion, depending on the data source, effectively functioning as base money for crypto markets.

A growing stablecoin float has historically tracked higher asset prices, providing fresh collateral for leveraged positions and instant liquidity for traders. If the halving constraints the faucet where new Bitcoins flow, stablecoins open the floodgates for demand.

A market ruled by flows

Kaiko Research’s October report captured the transformation in real time. Mid-month, a sudden wave of deleveraging erased more than $500 billion from the total market capitalization of crypto, as order-book depth evaporated and open interest reset to lower levels. The episode had all the hallmarks of a liquidity shock rather than a supply squeeze.

Bitcoin’s price didn’t fall because miners were dumping coins or because a new halving cycle was due. It fell because buyers disappeared, derivatives positions unwound, and the thinness of the order books amplified every sell order.

This is the world Wintermute describes: one governed by capital flows, not block rewards. The arrival of spot ETFs in the US and the broader expansion of institutional access have rewired Bitcoin’s price discovery. Flows from major funds now dictate trading sessions.

Price rallies now typically begin in US hours, when ETF activity is at its highest: a structural pattern that Kaiko has tracked since the products were launched. Liquidity in Europe and Asia still matters, but it now acts as a bridge between American sessions rather than a separate center of gravity.

This shift also explains the change in market volatility. During the earlier halving epochs, rallies tended to follow long, grinding accumulation phases, with retail enthusiasm layering on top of shrinking supply.

Now, the price can lurch several thousand dollars in a day, depending on whether ETF inflows or outflows dominate. The liquidity is institutional, but it’s also fickle, turning what used to be a predictable four-year rhythm into a market of short, sharp liquidity cycles.

That volatility is likely to persist. Futures funding and open interest data from CoinGlass indicate that leverage remains a significant swing factor, amplifying moves in both directions. When funding rates remain high for extended periods, it signals that traders are paying heavily to stay long, leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp reversal if the flows pause.

The October drawdown, which followed a surge in funding costs and a wave of ETF redemptions, offered a preview of how fragile the structure can be when liquidity dries up.

Yet even as those flows cooled, structural liquidity in the system continues to grow. Stablecoin issuance remains elevated. The FCA’s recent move to allow retail investors in the UK to access crypto exchange-traded notes has sparked a fee war among issuers, leading to increased turnover on the London Stock Exchange.

Each of these channels represents another conduit through which capital can reach Bitcoin, thereby tightening its correlation to global liquidity cycles and distancing it further from its self-contained halving cycles.

The Bitcoin market now behaves like any other large asset class, where monetary conditions drive performance. The halving calendar once dictated the tempo of investor psychology. Today, it is the Federal Reserve, ETF creation desks, and stablecoin issuers who set the beat.

In the next few months, Bitcoin’s trajectory will depend on liquidity variables. A base case sees Bitcoin oscillating between roughly $95,000 and $130,000 as ETF flows remain modestly positive and stablecoin supply continues its slow expansion.

A more bullish setup, with another record inflow week for ETFs or a regulatory green light for new listings, could send prices back toward $140,000 and above.

Conversely, a liquidity air pocket marked by multi-day ETF outflows and contracting stablecoin supply could pull Bitcoin back to the $90,000 zone as leverage resets again.

None of these outcomes depend on miner issuance or the distance from the halving. Instead, they depend on the rate at which capital enters or exits through the pipes that have replaced the halving as Bitcoin’s key throttle.

The implications reach beyond price. Kaiko’s data suggests ETFs have also changed the microstructure of the spot market itself, tightening spreads and deepening liquidity during US trading hours, but leaving off-hours thinner than before.

That shift means the health of Bitcoin’s market can now be gauged as much by ETF creation and redemption activity as by on-chain supply metrics. When miners’ daily output is absorbed by ETFs within minutes, it’s clear where the balance of power lies.

Bitcoin’s evolution into a liquidity-sensitive asset may disappoint those who once viewed the halving as a kind of cosmic event, a preordained countdown to riches. Yet, for an asset now held by institutions, benchmarked in ETFs, and traded against stablecoins that function as a private money supply, it’s simply a sign of maturity.

So perhaps the halving cycle isn’t dead, just demoted.

The block reward still decreases by half every four years, and some traders will always use it as a guide. But the true map now lies elsewhere. If the past decade taught investors to watch the halving clock, the next one will teach them to watch the flow tape.

The new calendar of Bitcoin isn’t four years long. It’s measured in billions of dollars moving in and out of ETFs, of stablecoins minted or redeemed, of capital searching for liquidity in a market that has outgrown its own mythology. The miners still keep time, but the tempo now belongs to the money.

The post Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle dead or are market makers in denial? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Source

Н News

Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle dead or are market makers in denial?

Liquidity rewrites the four-year cycle rules

A market ruled by flows

Similar news

Bitcoin Rallies Above $61K as US-Iran Talks Set to Resume on July 18

Bitget Launches U.S. Stock Options, Expands Stock+ Platform

Binance Reenters Philippine Market Through Newly Approved SEC Sandbox Program

Bitget CEO Gracy Chen Outlines Universal Exchange Vision Focused on AI and Tokenization

Alleged Scattered Spider Hacker Extradited to US Over $8M Crypto Ransom

GRAM Price Analysis: Can Telegram Push GRAM Back Above $2?

Н News

Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle dead or are market makers in denial?

Liquidity rewrites the four-year cycle rules

A market ruled by flows

Similar news

Bitcoin Rallies Above $61K as US-Iran Talks Set to Resume on July 18

Bitget Launches U.S. Stock Options, Expands Stock+ Platform

Binance Reenters Philippine Market Through Newly Approved SEC Sandbox Program

Bitget CEO Gracy Chen Outlines Universal Exchange Vision Focused on AI and Tokenization

Alleged Scattered Spider Hacker Extradited to US Over $8M Crypto Ransom

GRAM Price Analysis: Can Telegram Push GRAM Back Above $2?

Stay in touch