This site uses cookies. Browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies. If you need more information, please visit the Cookies Policy page
Subscribe
Прямой эфир
Cryptocurrencies: 3431 / Markets: 20747
Market Cap: $ 281 013 109 509 / 24h Vol: $ 181 986 832 051 / BTC Dominance: 63.4987%

Н News

SEC Calls Out Status of Telegram's TON, Doubting Development

528_aHR0cHM6Ly9zMy5jb2ludGVsZWdyYXBoLmNvbS9zdG9yYWdlL3VwbG9hZHMvdmlldy80M2Q1ZWM0YTRkNzczYzM0M2RiMmFkN2FiNTVkMDVkZC5qcGc=.jpg

Telegram lawsuit update shows the SEC bashing TON’s blockchain development and lack of Gram token use cases.

In the latest from U.S. Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) ongoing lawsuit against Telegram for its offering of Gram tokens, the commission bashes the messaging service’s blockchain and related token.

In a lengthy filing with the court of the Southern District of New York the SEC responded to Telegram’s earlier motion for summary judgment. In it, the SEC disparaged the Telegram Open Network (TON) — Telegram’s blockchain — as well as the operation’s Gram (GRM) token. 

“Telegram Has Put Forth No Evidence Regarding the TON Blockchain’s State of Development at Launch,” the Jan. 21, 2020 document reads, adding, “Telegram Marketed Few, if Any, Expected Uses for Grams.”

Telegram’s Troubles

Telegram hosted its initial coin offering (ICO) in 2018, running two private investment stages that banked the messaging company $1.7 billion in total funds.

In 2019, the SEC began an investigation into Telegraph’s crypto endeavors, claiming the entity did not register with the commission for the ICO and its Gram tokens. 

The SEC’s concerns

According to the recent court filing, Telegram stated use cases for GRM tokens within certain applications. The document, however, also pointed out that GRM usage is not a necessity within such apps. 

Additionally, Telegram provided a chart listing GRM uses, applications, etc., although, the SEC also noted several concerns with the company’s chart. 

“Telegram’s chart does not distinguish which potential applications have been developed, which are in the process of development, and which are theoretical,” the SEC’s filing detailed. “There is no direct, reliable evidence in the record regarding the nature or state of any of the potential applications listed in Telegram’s chart.”

The court document lists numerous other question marks relating to GRM token usage, as well as Telegram’s entire offering, showing that the SEC has no shortage of concerns on the matter, with no resolution currently at hand. 

Over the past two years, Cointelegraph has detailed the SEC’s crackdown on numerous ICOs regarding their associated tokens and blockchains in an effort to police the largely unregulated burgeoning crypto industry.

Source

comments powered by Disqus