This site uses cookies. Browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies. If you need more information, please visit the Cookies Policy page
Subscribe
Прямой эфир
Cryptocurrencies: 3442 / Markets: 20680
Market Cap: $ 281 131 478 222 / 24h Vol: $ 161 784 083 847 / BTC Dominance: 62.8127%

Н News

E Pluribus Unum: Four Class-Action Suits Against Bitfinex Over 2017 BTC Price Now One

528_aHR0cHM6Ly9zMy5jb2ludGVsZWdyYXBoLmNvbS9zdG9yYWdlL3VwbG9hZHMvdmlldy9jMDYyOGNhNWVhNzdiNThkZTEwOWNmOWFiNjIxMzc5Yi5qcGc=.jpg

A New York judge has ordered that the four class-action lawsuits against Bitfinex for 2017 manipulation of the Bitcoin market are now one, though leadership remains uncertain.

The four class-action suits against Bitfinex, Tether and parent company iFinex over alleged market manipulation leading to Bitcoin’s (BTC) 2017 bull market have been consolidated — with implications for every BTC buyer since April 2017.

Per an order dated Jan. 24 and filed Jan. 27 from Judge Failla of the court of the Southern District of New York (SDNY), four complaints have been consolidated. Plaintiffs Leibowitz, Young, Faubus and Ebanks — as well as assorted sub-listed parties in each of those cases — will now have their cases heard jointly. 

The original allegations and controversy surrounding Bitfinex, Tether

The class-action suits against iFinex and its daughter companies crypto exchange Bitfinex and stablecoin operator Tether allege that those companies worked together to create Bitcoin’s infamous price bubble at the end of 2017. These complaints followed similar research that appeared this summer. 

The potential class pool for these cases is massive, potentially including anyone who has bought Bitcoin since April.

The relationship between iFinex, Bitfinex and Tether has been the source of considerable controversy, with one of the complaints in this class-action including the below schema (BFXWW and BFXNA are the names of Bitfinex’s legal registration): 

Source: Ebanks v. iFinex

Ebanks’ complaint alleges that the relationship between these entities was deliberately opaque to allow illegal activity, explaining: 

“Despite defendants’ best efforts, the close interconnections between Tether and Bitfinex were exposed, in part, through the leak of documents from offshore legal services provider Appleby (colloquially dubbed the “Paradise Papers” leak) in November 2017.”

A separate legal action by the New York Attorney General also accuses the companies of using their concealed relationship to commit financial crimes. In that case, the attorney general believes that Bitfinex used its revenue to cover an $850 million dollar loss from Tether’s reserves, which are designed to back its stablecoin USDT 1-to-1 with the United States Dollar.

Who will lead the four cases?

As Cointelegraph reported, the leadership of these four cases remains in question. Chronologically among complaints, Leibowitz was first to appear in October, while Young would file in Washington State in November before relocating to the SDNY earlier this month. Both Faubus and Ebanks would file after Young’s relocation.

Source

comments powered by Disqus